Controllable Preparation of Ultrathin Sandwich

Jan 21, 2024

Scientific Reports volume 5, Article number: 14961 (2015) Cite this article

2792 Accesses

6 Citations

Metrics details

Porous organic frameworks (POFs) based membranes have potential applications in molecular filtration, despite the lack of a corresponding study. This study reports an interesting strategy to get processable POFs dispersion and a novel ultrathin sandwich-like membrane design. It was accidentally found that the hydrophobic N-rich Schiff based POFs agglomerates could react with lithium-ethylamine and formed stable dispersion in water. By successively filtrating the obtained POFs dispersion and graphene oxide (GO), we successfully prepared ultrathin sandwich-like hybrid membranes with layered structure, which showed significantly improved separation efficiency in molecular filtration of organic dyes. This study may provide a universal way to the preparation of processable POFs and their hybrid membranes with GO.

Combining adsorption and filtration is an efficient way to realize molecular separation for various applications with benefits of low energy consumption and easy operation1,2,3. Many well-known nanoporous materials such as zeolites and metal organic frameworks (MOFs) have been used in molecular separation processes4,5,6. As a nonmetallic counterpart of MOFs, porous organic frameworks (POFs) are formed by the covalent cross-linking of diverse organic moieties. Their pure organic nanostructure, tunable pore sizes and high permeability and stability endows POFs great promise for applications in molecular separation7,8, especially for water purification that is sensitive to metal contamination. However, corresponding studies have been hampered by its intrinsic hydrophobic property and agglomeration nature. As a consequence, the adsorptive separation using pristine POFs was usually conducted in the time and energy consuming batch condition, which is not suitable for practical applications. Therefore, it is desirable to assemble POFs into hydrophilic membranes for the fast and cost-effective molecular separation.

On the other hand, the separation mechanisms of the adsorptive membrane are mainly based on the interaction between the molecules and sorbents, including electrostatic adsorption, affinity adsorption and so on9. Despite the interaction can be affected by many factors (depending on the specific mechanisms involved), increasing the effective path length of the membrane is a common strategy to improve the separation efficiency10. For a same membrane, however, increase in the membrane’s thickness will result in an unavoidable increase in cost, an obvious decrease in the utilization of adsorption sites, as well as the great loss of flux and filtrate.

Inspired by the graphene oxide (GO) membranes11,12,13,14,15, we propose hereby an ultrathin sandwich-like membrane design (Fig. 1a), which can simultaneously increase the separation efficiency and the utilization of adsorption sites. Our proof-of-concept demonstration is based on the use of processable N-rich Schiff based POFs (SWN) (Fig. 1b) as the sorbent and the GO nanosheets as two-dimensional (2D) interval layers. In this sandwich-like hybrid membrane, the horizontal microfluidic channels built by the GO can significantly increase the effective separation path in the POFs matrix without increasing their loading and thickness. Notably, during the molecular filtration, the hybrid membrane shows significantly better separation efficiency (Fig. 1c,d) and stability, which is highly desired in the pressure-driven molecular filtration process.

(a) Illustration for the preparation of the sandwich-like membrane. (b) Digital photo of P-SWN and pristine SWN dispersion with concentration of ~0.5 mg mL−1. (c) Digital photo of a hybrid membrane on PTFE support. (d) Digital photos of filtration equipment and the MO solutions (10 mg L−1) before and after filtration.

This study was started by an accidental finding during the interaction of SWN and lithium-ethylamine (Li-EDA). Our initial purpose was to isolate the SWN agglomerates by lithium intercalation and mutual electrostatic repulsion. This strategy has been successfully used to debundle carbon nanotubes16. When the SWN was added into the Li-EDA solution, we found that the blue color of Li-EDA gradually disappeared. This phenomenon should be attributed to the facile electron transfer17 from Li-EDA to SWN. At the same time, the SWN gradually swelled and formed homogeneous yellow dispersion. To our surprise, different from the treated carbon nanotubes that will immediately form antisolvent precipitation when dropped into water18, the obtained SWN could be readily dispersed and form processable dispersion (P-SWN) in water. On the other hand, pristine SWN could not be dispersed in water even after intensive sonication, because of its hydrophobic property and agglomerate structure.

Subsequent careful characterizations revealed that SWN could undergo interesting reactions with Li-EDA. Compared with the pristine SWN, the 13C NMR spectra (Fig. 2) of the P-SWN shows two new resonance peaks at around 157 ppm and 38 ppm, which can be assigned to the C = N and C−H bonds, respectively19,20. In concert with the 13C NMR results, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) reveals that the SWN has stronger stretching vibrations of C = N and C−H bonds after the treatment with Li-EDA (Fig. S1, Supporting Information). These results suggest the formation of C = N and aliphatic C−H bonds in the obtained P-SWN, probably caused by the deamination of the aminal linkages21 and the partial hydrogenation by Li-EDA. In brief, the aromatic rings in the SWN will be partially hydrogenated by Li-EDA, which is widely used for the hydrogenation of aromatic rings (Benkeser reaction)22,23,24. It should be noted that SWN was synthesized through the reaction of primary amines and the imine bonds in Schiff-base. Therefore, the formation of imine bonds should be attributed to corresponding reverse reactions, which may be caused by the strong basicity and reducing activity of Li-EDA. This hypothesis is confirmed by the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (Fig. 3). According to previous studies25, the N 1s line of SWN can be deconvoluted into two main peaks with the binding energy of 398.55 eV and 399.8 eV, corresponding to the triazine units (C = N) and aminal linkages (C−N), respectively. After reacted with Li-EDA, the C−N decreases, while the C = N component (triazine and imine) increases and the protonated amine groups (−NH2/NH3+) appear.

Solid-state 13C NMR spectra of pristine SWN (blue) and the obtained P-SWN (red).

The two new resonance peaks at around 157 ppm and 38 ppm are signed to C =N and C−H bonds, respectively.

N 1s XPS spectra of pristine SWN and the obtained P-SWN.

Note that the C−N decrease with the appearance of the protonated amine groups (−NH2/NH3+) after reacted with Li-EDA.

Generally, highly cross-linked structure and extended π-conjugation building block endow SWN and other POFs with a porous skeleton. This rigid structure and hydrophobic property makes them difficult to be dispersed in water or other solvents. We believe that the reduction of some aromatic rings and the formation of the hydrophilic imine and amine groups account for the swelling phenomenon and the improved dispersibility in water. A Direct evidence comes from the fact that the zeta potential of SWN increases from +9 mV to +36 mV (at pH = 7) after react with Li-EDA. Besides, the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (Fig. 4) reveal a decrease in adsorption capacity of steep gas uptake at relatively low pressure (P/P0 < 0.001), indicating the partly collapse of rigid aromatic skeleton during hydrogenation and deamination. The hysteresis loops were changed from H1-type to H4-type, which should be caused by the reduced agglomeration after the reaction.

The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms for SWN and P-SWN.

Notably, despite the changes of pore structure (H−K and BJH analysis in Fig. S2) and the decrease in specific surface area (SBET) (decreased from 608 m2 g−1 to 299 m2 g−1), the saturated adsorption ability (Qeq) of P-SWG toward negatively charged MO increased significantly from 123 mg g−1 to 232 mg g−1 after the reaction (Table S1 in Supporting Information). On the contrary, the Qeq toward positively charged MB remained a similar value. Based on these results, we can conclude that the adsorption ability of the adsorptive membrane is controlled by the interaction between the molecules and sorbent, in line with previous studies on molecular separation26,27. However, the change of the pore structure and porosity may also contribute to the mass transfer and flux during membrane filtration process.

To explore the potential of porous organic frameworks in molecular filtration, ultrathin sandwich-like membranes with intercalated layers of GO and P-SWN were prepared by the successive filtration of GO and P-SWN dispersion through a PTFE support. We proposed that the horizontal microfluidic channels built by the GO and POFs could significantly increase the effective path length and the stability of the membrane. Given the negative influence of GO on the water flux (Fig. S3, Supporting Information), GO loading of ~3 mg m−2 was chosen to deposit every intercalated GO layer and the same amount of P-SWN was used in every membrane. The different layered structures can be easily controlled by varying the filtration processes. For example, SEM images of the obtained hybrid membranes with 1, 2, 4, 8 layers of P-SWN (named PSG-1, PSG-2, PSG-4 and PSG-8, P-SWN loading of ~0.67 mg) were shown in Fig. 5a–d, respectively. Despite the uneven surfaces, the thickness of the all the membranes are ~1 μm, as the same amount of P-SWN were used and the thickness of GO can be ignored. It should be noted that the negatively charged GO and positively charged P-SWN layers can form a compact membrane because of their strong electrostatic attraction. In addition, the obvious corrugations on GO should contribute to a better water flux28,29.

Cross-sectional SEM images for PSG-1 (a), PSG-2 (b), PSG-4 (c) and PSG-8 (d), respectively. The GO layers are highlighted with white rectangle. The total P-SWN loading is ~0.67 mg in every membrane and the GO loading is ~3 mg m−2 in every GO layer.

MO, a common organic contaminate in effluent, was used as the probe to study the filtration performances of these hybrid membranes. Normally, the as-prepared membranes with the PTFE support and P-SWN control were tested under an applied pressure of 1 bar. The breakthrough curves fit by Boltzmann model30 are summarized in Fig. 6. The breakthrough volume (VB) is the volume that corresponds to 1% of max concentration of the dye in the effluent and the adsorption capacity (Q) corresponds to the dye amount adsorbed in membrane when effluent concentration reached 99% of the max concentration. Compared with the P-SWN control (pink line), the VB of the membranes quickly increases with the increasing GO layer number until it reaches a stagnant when the GO layer number is over 4 (Table 1). The Q data show similar trend, which suggests the adsorption of the introduced GO can be neglected, attributed to its small loading and negatively charged nature31. Actually, the control experiment with a pure GO membrane (3 mg g−1) on the PTFE support demonstrates that limited MO could be retained. However, it should be noted that the introduction of GO will resulted in the decline of the flux (ν), especially when the P-SWN layer number is over 4.

The experimental plots (the error bars represent the s.d. from three independent experiments) and Boltzmann fit of the breakthrough curves for the as-prepared hybrid membranes and P-SWN control.

The feed concentration is 10 mg L−1 MO. The effective filtration area of the membrane is 4.1 cm2 with total P-SWN loading of ~0.67 mg. The applied pressure is fixed as 1 bar.

Based on the Werkhoven-Goëwie model (described in Method)30,32, the theoretical plates (N)—the main index used to determine the effectiveness of a separation process—increase significantly when more GO layers are introduced in the sandwich-like membranes. The N of the PSG-4 membrane with a decent flux value can be calculated to be 21.83, which is about 4.5-fold of a pure P-SWN membrane. The improved separation efficiency could be explained by the increased effective path length and the higher utilization ratios of adsorption sites. In a pure P-SWN membrane, the flow will arbitrarily select the paths of less mass transfer resistance, resulting in the waste of abundant adsorption sites. Whereas the introduction of GO and the formation of horizontal fluidic channels can reduce the flow anisotropy and the flow death zones.

As expected, increasing the applied pressure could increase the flux but resulted in the degradation of the separation efficiency (Fig. S4 and insert). When the applied pressure reaches 3 bar, the flux of PSG-4 increases to 4181 ± 721 L m−2 h−1 and the Q decreases to 100.7 μg. In comparison, control experiments with a pure P-SWN membrane show the concentration of the effluent quickly reaches the feed concentration. These results indicate that the sandwich-like hybrid membrane has higher stability than the membrane without GO, especially for the filtration process under a higher pressure.

It should be noted that the breakthrough volume and adsorption capacity of the membranes can be easily scaled up by increasing the loading of P-SWN. Despite the increased feed concentration (20 mg L−1), the VB of a scaled-up PSG-4 membrane with P-SWN loading of ~6.7 mg can reach 47 ml, which means an MO adsorption capacity of 140.3 mg g−1 (Fig. 7). Importantly, the filtrated volume of the scaled-up PSG-4 at 10% breakthrough keeps constant even after 7 cycles (Fig. 7 and Fig. S5), while that of the P-SWN counterpart reduced gradually from 56 mL to 18 mL, probably due to the disassembly of P-SWN from the PTFE support.

Cycling test of the scaled-up PSG-4 membrane.

The breakthrough curves for fresh scaled-up PSG-4 (black line) and the membrane after 7 cycles (red line). The error bars represent the s.d. from three independent experiments. The feed concentration is 20 mg L−1 MO. The effective filtration area of the membrane is 4.1 cm2 with P-SWN loading of ~6.7 mg. The applied pressure is fixed as 1 bar.

In summary, we found that the N-rich Schiff based POF (SWN) could react with Li-EDA and formed processable dispersion (P-SWN). It is believed that the reduction of many aromatic rings and the formation of the new hydrophilic imine and amine groups account for the excellent dispersibility of P-SWN in water. We also demonstrated that the successively filtrating the obtained P-SWN and GO could be used to prepare a unique sandwich-like membrane with significantly improved separation efficiency in molecular filtration. This novel membrane structure with horizontal fluidic channels can significantly increase the effective path length and increases the utilization of adsorption sites. The strategy and methods used here may be readily changed to prepare other processable POFs and hybrid membranes for applications in molecular filtration.

Melamine (313 mg, 2.485 mmol), para-phthaladehyde (500 mg, 3.728 mmol) and dimethyl sulfoxide (15.5 ml) were added to a dried Schlenk flask fitted with a condenser and a magnetic stirring bar. After being degassed with argon bubbles, the mixture was heated to 453 K for 72 h under an inert atmosphere. When reaction completed and the reactor cooled down to room temperature, the precipitated SWN-1 powder was isolated via filtration over a Büchner funnel and washed with excess tetrahydrofurane and dichloromethate. The solvent was removed under vacuum at room temperature to afford the materials as off-white powders in 55% yield.

The lithium amide solution (Li-EDA) was prepared as follows. Firstly, 100 mL of dry ethylenediamine (EDA) was added to an argon-purged Schlenk flask. Then, 100 mg of Li was added at room temperature. Dissolution of Li was fast with the formation of a blue solution (solvated electron). The as-prepared SWN-1 (100 mg) was added to this solution and the solution was stirred at room temperatures for 1 h to get uniform yellow SWN-1 dispersion. The resulting dispersion was dropped into water to obtain P-SWN aqueous dispersion.

The GO aqueous dispersion was prepared by adding a certain amount of GO (prepared by Hummer’s method) into water followed by 1 h ultrasonication. The resulting dispersion was centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 30 min and the supernatant was collected.

P-SWN and GO dispersions were alternately filtrated through PTFE support with 0.22 μm pore size. To ensure consistency between membranes with different GO layer, the P-SWN loading was kept as a constant. Once the filtration was completed, 10 ml of HCL (0.1 M) were filtrated to remove the remaining ethylene diamine and Li ions. The resultant membrane was washed by deionized water until the effluent is neutral. All membranes were stored in water to keep wet before use. The film is uniform and coherent but does not, in this first example, have sufficient mechanical strength to be self-supporting upon removal.

The filtration experiments were conducted with a dead-end stirred cell (Model 8010, Millpore Co., USA. The volume capacity is 10 mL and the effective area of the membrane is 4.1 cm–2). In this study, all membranes were tested without removing the PTFE support. The as-prepared membrane was placed in the cell and dye solutions with different initial concentration were filtrated through the membrane at desired pressure. The effluent at each stage was collected and analyzed. In the membrane recycle stage, 30 mL of eluent (1 M HCL in 80% methanol) was filtrated through the membrane. Then the membrane was washed by filtrating deionized water to neutral for another cycle.

The experimental plot of breakthrough curves can be fitted by Boltzmann model as Eqs. (1):

Where γ represents the ration of the effluent to the feed concentration, x is the volume of effluent, A1 and A2 are two regression parameters.

Retention volume (VR) and Breakthrough volume (VB) were calculated as expressed in Eqs. (2) and (3), respectively:

The theoretical plate can be calculated by Werkhoven-Goëwie model as Eqs. (4):

How to cite this article: Zhu, Y. et al. Controllable Preparation of Ultrathin Sandwich-Like Membrane with Porous Organic Framework and Graphene Oxide for Molecular Filtration. Sci. Rep. 5, 14961; doi: 10.1038/srep14961 (2015).

Liang, H. W. et al. Robust and Highly Efficient Free-Standing Carbonaceous Nanofiber Membranes for Water Purification. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 3851–3858 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Wen, Q. et al. Flexible inorganic nanofibrous membranes with hierarchical porosity for efficient water purification. Chem. Sci. 4, 4378–4382 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Chen, P. et al. Carbonaceous nanofiber membrane functionalized by beta-cyclodextrins for molecular filtration. ACS Nano 5, 5928–5935 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Van de Voorde, B., Bueken, B., Denayer, J. & De Vos, D. Adsorptive separation on metal-organic frameworks in the liquid phase. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 5766–5788 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Varoon, K. et al. Dispersible exfoliated zeolite nanosheets and their application as a selective membrane. Science 334, 72–75 (2011).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Wang, J., Li, M., Sun, K. & Liu, C. J. Three-dimensional printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene framework coated with Cu-BTC metal-organic frameworks for the removal of methylene blue. Sci. Rep. 4, 5939–5945, (2014).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

Xu Y., Jin S., Xu H., Nagai A. & Jiang D. Conjugated microporous polymers: design, synthesis and application. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 8012–8031 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Song, Q. et al. Controlled thermal oxidative crosslinking of polymers of intrinsic microporosity towards tunable molecular sieve membranes. Nat. Commun. 5, 4813–4824 (2014).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Liu, J. W., Liang, H. W. & Yu S. H. Macroscopic-scale assembled nanowire thin films and their functionalities. Chem. Rev. 112, 4770–4799 (2012).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Mulder, M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology. (Kluwer Academic, 1996).

Mi, B. Materials science. Graphene oxide membranes for ionic and molecular sieving. Science 343, 740–742 (2014).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

Nair, R. R., Wu, H. A., Jayaram, P. N., Grigorieva, I. V. & Geim, A. K. Unimpeded permeation of water through helium-leak-tight graphene-based membranes. Science 335, 442–444 (2012).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

Huang, H. et al. Ultrafast viscous water flow through nanostrand-channelled graphene oxide membranes. Nat. Commun. 4, 2979–2987 (2013).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Han, Y., Xu, Z. & Gao, C. Ultrathin Graphene Nanofiltration Membrane for Water Purification. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 3693–3700 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ogata, C. et al. Metal permeation into multi-layered graphene oxide. Sci. Rep. 4, 3647–3652 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Viswanathan, G. et al. Single-step in situ synthesis of polymer-grafted single-wall nanotube composites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 9258–9259 (2003).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Liang, F. et al. A Convenient Route to Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes. Nano Lett. 4, 1257–1260 (2004).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

Tang, X. et al. Reductive Alkylation and Arylation of Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes in Ethylenediamine via Benkeser Reaction. Chem Lett. 38, 220–221 (2009).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Schwab, M. G. et al. Catalyst-free Preparation of Melamine-Based Microporous Polymer Networks through Schiff Base Chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 7216–7217 (2009).

Article CAS Google Scholar

El-Ghazawy, R. A. et al. Preparation and characterization of melamine-based porous Schiff base polymer networks for hydrogen storage. J. Polym. Res. 21, 480–489 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Layer, R. W. The Chemistry of Imines. Chem. Rev. 63, 489–510 (1963).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Benkeser, R. A., Robinson, R. E., Sauve, D. M. & Thomas, O. H. Reduction of Organic Compounds by Lithium in Low Molecular Weight Amines. I. Selective Reduction of Aromatic Hydrocarbons to Monoölefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77, 3230–3233 (1955).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Benkeser, R. A., Arnold, C., Lambert, R. F. & Thomas, O. H. Reduction of Organic Compounds by Lithium in Low Molecular Weight Amines III. Reduction of Aromatic Compounds Containing Functional Groups. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77, 6042–6045 (1955).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Benkeser, R. A., Robinson, R. E., Sauve, D. M. & Thomas, O. H. Selective Reductions of Aromatic Systems to MonoÖlefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76, 631–632 (1954).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Yang, G., Han, H., Du, C., Luo, Z. & Wang, Y. Facile synthesis of melamine-based porous polymer networks and their application for removal of aqueous mercury ions. Polymer 51, 6193–6202 (2010).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Dawson, R. et al. Functionalized Conjugated Microporous Polymers. Macromolecules 42, 8809–8816 (2009).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

Lu, W. et al. Sulfonate-grafted porous polymer networks for preferential CO2 adsorption at low pressure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 18126–18129 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Qiu, L. et al. Controllable corrugation of chemically converted graphene sheets in water and potential application for nanofiltration. Chem. Commun. 47, 5810–5812 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Wei, N., Peng, X. & Xu, Z. Understanding water permeation in graphene oxide membranes. AC. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 5877–5883 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Chigome, S. & Torto, N. Electrospun nanofiber-based solid-phase extraction. TrAC Trends in Anal. Chem. 38, 21–31 (2012).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Yang, S. T. et al. Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by graphene oxide. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 359, 24–29 (2011).

Article CAS ADS Google Scholar

Werkhoven-Goewie, C. E., Brinkman, U. A. T. & Frei, R. W. Trace enrichment of polar compounds on chemically bonded and carbonaceous sorbents and application to chlorophenol. Anal. Chem. 53, 2072–2080 (1981).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Funds for Excellent Young Scholars (No. 21222608), Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China (No. 201251), Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (No. NCET-12-0392) and the Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (No. B06006).

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China

Yuanzhi Zhu, Danyun Xu, Qingshan Zhao, Yang Li, Wenchao Peng, Guoliang Zhang, Fengbao Zhang & Xiaobin Fan

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

X.B.F. and Y.Z.Z. designed the experiments and Y.Z.Z. performed main experiments. D.Y.X. measured the SEM images and Q.S.Z. performed the FTIR analysis. Y.L. and W.C.P. conducted the XPS analysis. F.B.Z. and G.L.Z. calculated the theoretical plate. X.B.F. and Y.Z.Z. wrote the manuscript and all authors discussed the results in the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

Zhu, Y., Xu, D., Zhao, Q. et al. Controllable Preparation of Ultrathin Sandwich-Like Membrane with Porous Organic Framework and Graphene Oxide for Molecular Filtration. Sci Rep 5, 14961 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14961

Download citation

Received: 27 May 2015

Accepted: 09 September 2015

Published: 12 October 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14961

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.